Home / For practitioners

For practitioners

What published research and documented traditions say about the questions people ask when they guide, sit with or host others, and what we did not find measured. Free, with a source and a reliability level on every claim.

Many people who guide, sit with or host others learned what they know from friends, forums, retreats and their own experience. We do not judge that, and we are not here to fight it. We understand why it happens.

We gather what research and documented traditions report, about benefit as well as risk, and give it here for free, with a source and a reliability level on every claim. Pick a question below, and tell us what is missing or where we got something wrong.

Read this first. This is education, not instructions, and not medical or legal advice. Metanoia supplies no substance and recommends no dose. Most substances discussed here are Schedule I under U.S. federal law (21 CFR 1308.11), state programs such as Oregon's and Colorado's do not change that, and the law differs between countries. We take no position on the legality of any setting, practice or person.
What this page offers, in about two minutes. Captions are built into the video.

Ready now

Twenty-six questions are written up in full. Every other topic below is in preparation. A topic goes up once its sources have been read in full.

Rules, surveys, traditions

Training and certificates for guides

Is a paid training worth it? What does a certificate give, and does it change how sessions go?

Read the card
Studies, field reports

Antidepressants and other psychiatric medicines

Does an antidepressant dull the experience? What about lithium, and what about weight-loss medicines?

Read the card
Studies, traditions, field reports

When it gets hard: what helpers do in the moment

What do helpers find out and do when someone is overwhelmed, and how common are hard moments?

Read the card
Studies, traditions, field reports

Ayahuasca and San Pedro ceremonies

What do surveys, one placebo-controlled study and traditions describe, and what is not known about the plants and the setting?

Read the card
Studies, traditions, field reports

Integration: what happens after a session

What does integration mean, what do retreats and providers report, and does it change how people fare?

Read the card
Studies, codes, traditions

Consent, power and boundaries between guides and participants

What do reviews, a trial and one code say about consent, touch and boundaries, and what has not been measured?

Read the card
Studies, case reports, retreat interviews

Ayahuasca and antidepressants

What have a simulation, a survey, case reports and retreat interviews measured, and what has not been measured?

Read the card
Surveys, rules, guidelines

What a guide or sitter does, and what they leave alone

What do surveys, one state's rules and laboratory guidelines say a sitter does, and does having one change anything?

Read the card
Pooled studies, a preprint, reviews

Women, men and the life cycle: cycle, menopause, differences in response

Do healthy women and men differ in the acute response, and what is known about the menstrual cycle, contraception and menopause?

Read the card
Studies, surveys, registry records

Preparing and setting an intention

What did studies measure about intention and state of mind before a session, and how is preparation reported?

Read the card
Rules, surveys, a traditional study

Getting into the field: apprenticeship, careers, pay

What do official sources and surveys report about licence costs, prices and routes, and what was not located on pay?

Read the card
Guidelines, surveys, state rules

Screening before a session: what programs ask and why

What do guidelines, retreat organisations, practitioners and two state programs report asking about health, and does asking change what happens?

Read the card
Animal studies, a pharmacology review

Weight-loss and diabetes medicines (GLP-1)

Do GLP-1 medicines change the effect of a classic psychedelic? What was located, and what was not?

Read the card
State rules, a cohort, a survey, a review

Keeping track: outcomes, follow-up and records

What do state rules and studies report about records, follow-up and adverse event reporting, and what was not located?

Read the card
Trials, reviews, a mouse study

Heart and blood pressure: what studies measured

What do trials and reviews report about heart rate and blood pressure in a session, and what is not known about the heart and valves?

Read the card
Surveys, health records, a review

Mental health history: what studies measured

Is a history of psychosis, mania or trauma linked to what happens after psychedelic use, and what is not known?

Read the card
Surveys, a helpline log, state rules

Alone, at home, or remotely: what has been reported

Does being alone, at home or connected only by video change what happens in a session, and what do licensing rules say?

Read the card
Trials, surveys, case reports, retreat interviews

Combining substances and multi-day sequences: what has been reported

What is documented about taking more than one substance in a session or retreat, together or on consecutive days?

Read the card
Ethics papers, codes, state texts

Consent and agreements: what sources describe

What do ethics papers, published codes and state texts say about consent and written agreements for guided sessions?

Read the card
Descriptive study, interviews, fieldwork

Retreats: what is offered, promised and charged

What do retreats advertise, what do they list as prices, and has anyone tested their claims?

Read the card
Surveys, a helpline log, poison centres, coroners' records

When things go wrong: kinds of harm reported

What kinds of harm do published sources report in connection with natural psychedelics, and how was each one counted?

Read the card
Federal rules, court opinion, state and national texts

Regulated and unregulated: what legal texts say about Oregon, Colorado and elsewhere

Which places run licensed, supervised programs with natural psychedelics, and what do official texts say about what sits outside them?

Read the card
Pilot trials, a systematic review, interviews, state rules

One-to-one, group, or couples: what has been reported

How are sessions with one facilitator, in a group and with a couple described, and what is known about each?

Read the card
Official pages, community lists, surveys

Choosing a guide or a retreat: the questions people ask

What do published lists name as questions and warning signs, and is any of it known to relate to outcomes?

Read the card
Systematic review, trials, an interview study

Music in a session: what is played and who chooses

What do published sources report about the music played during a session, and does any of it show a link to outcomes?

Read the card
Laboratory study, review, surveys

How common hard experiences are, and how long they last

How often do people report a hard experience, and why can the figures not be compared directly?

Read the card

Each card opens with a short answer in plain words. Below it, in sections you can open one by one, are what people in the field say (marked as reported practice, not a recommendation), what research knows, what is not known, and what traditions describe. At the end come the related elements of the Metanoia Exposure Record data element set and the sources, each with a level and a reading status.

Find a topic

The full list of 49 topics follows, grouped by where they come up in the work.

Before a session: health, medicines, who takes part

Preparing the session

During the session

Substances and combinations

After the session

  • Integration: what happens after a sessionReady
  • Lasting difficulties: sleep, feeling unreal, feeling cut offIn preparation
  • Repeated sessions and changing responseIn preparation
  • Support lines, peers and supervisionIn preparation

Conduct, boundaries and law

Getting into the work and running it

Measuring and outcomes

Upcoming topics

These 22 topics are on our list and not yet written up. They are in no promised order and no date is promised, because a topic goes up only after its sources have been read in full. Two of them, marked on the list above as held for extra review, wait for a second check before they go up. If a question you ask is missing, write to main@metanoia-ca.org and we will add it to the list.

  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding and hormones
  • Age: younger and older people
  • Everyday substances around a session: cannabis, alcohol, nicotine, caffeine
  • Diet, fasting and preparing the body
  • The room and its safety set-up
  • A friend, a partner, a therapist or a remote “witness”
  • Calming medicines in a crisis
  • Physical risk and getting medical help
  • Touch and massage
  • Amounts, top-ups and step-ups, as reported in studies
  • What is in it: identity, testing, variability
  • 5-MeO-DMT and bufo
  • Ketamine
  • Microdosing
  • Other substances: iboga and ibogaine, LSD, mescaline, kambo and peyote
  • Lasting difficulties: sleep, feeling unreal, feeling cut off
  • Repeated sessions and changing response
  • Support lines, peers and supervision
  • Legal risk for people who sit or host
  • The sacred, “the medicine”, the dieta: spiritual and traditional framing
  • Using AI as a helper
  • What is claimed about benefit, and what has actually been measured

Records and the set

Metanoia has published a draft set of 23 common data elements for records of exposure that arise outside clinical trials. It is version 1.1, open for comment until 2 December 2026. Each card lists the elements of the set that ask about the same area. Fields record what a source reported. None recommends an amount, a route, a preparation or a setting, and publishing the set is not a request for anyone's data.

Forms to download

These four documents already exist and are published with the data element set. They are version 1.1, dated 25 September 2026, released under CC BY 4.0. They are for reading and printing and are not interactive forms. The record form is a paper or on-screen layout of the 23 elements. It records what a source reported. It is not guidance on use and not a clinical, screening or diagnostic tool, and anyone who uses it is responsible for their own consent, privacy and legal review.

Send us reports

What happens in sessions, retreats and centers outside supervised programs mostly goes unrecorded. We want to hear it. Metanoia runs an anonymous research channel for these accounts. It asks for roles and never for names, and we take no position on the legal status of anything a report describes. The channel is open, and its privacy terms and publication policy are on the form page.

How to read a card

Level 1 is a primary or peer-reviewed source. Level 2 is a reliable secondary source. Level 3 is grey literature such as community material. Level 4 is traditional or ethnographic. Levels 3 and 4 describe the type of source and do not rank its quality.

What people in the field report is level 3 and carries the marking "Reported practice, not a recommendation". It is kept apart from what research knows and is never merged with it into one line that reads like advice. "Not located" always comes with the date and the databases searched, because a later search could find something.

Background reading on what research shows about this field, and the questions and answers about this work, are on the earlier overview page.

Comments and corrections

Comments on the data element set and corrections to what we report are welcome at main@metanoia-ca.org. For the set, put "CDE v1.1" in the subject line. Accounts of what happened in a session belong in the field reports channel, not in email. Please leave out names and anything that identifies a person or a place. If we have reported something wrongly, tell us. We read every comment.